Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 14.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 477 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 mini has a score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. Apple iPhone 12 mini's design is newer, noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro. The Apple iPhone 12 mini works with iOS 14.x OS, while Galaxy XCover Pro works with Android 11 OS.
Apple iPhone 12 mini counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Apple iPhone 12 mini also counts with a little bit greater pixel quantity in each display inch. Apple iPhone 12 mini has a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 12 mini also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone 12 mini captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a lot higher video quality. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 12 mini, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a superior battery lifetime than iPhone 12 mini, because it has an 82 percent bigger battery size.
The iPhone 12 mini is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.