Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | HTC |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 457 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is better than HTC One M9's 77.7 score. IPhone 12 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, while HTC One M9 comes with Android 5.0 operating system. Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is extremely heavier than HTC One M9, it's much thinner and much newer.
IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a slightly better display than HTC One M9, because it has a little bit better display pixel density, a much bigger display and a better 1284 x 2778 resolution. The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a bit better hardware performance than HTC One M9, because although it has an inferior number of cores and doesn't have a GPU, and they both have a 64 bits CPU, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also counts with a larger amount of RAM.
IPhone 12 Pro Max has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The HTC One M9 features a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a way smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures in low-light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the HTC One M9 also counts with a camera with way more megapixels.
IPhone 12 Pro Max features greater battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 3687mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One M9. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get HTC One M9, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.