Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-11-13 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 global score. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's body is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, but it's thicker and noticeably heavier. IPhone 12 Pro Max has a sharper screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite greater amount of pixels in each display inch, a higher resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a bigger screen.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a superior hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone 12 Pro Max has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has faster video frame rates and a bigger aperture for better images in low-light environments.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has better battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3687mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Moto Z2 Play, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.