Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-11-13 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is much better than the Moto Z3's global score of 77.6. IPhone 12 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Moto Z3 works with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Even though iPhone 12 Pro Max is incredibly newer than the Moto Z3, it's just a bit thicker and way heavier.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a better display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a quite better display density and a higher resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels. The Moto Z3 counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a faster processing unit than Moto Z3, because although it has lesser processing cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a higher amount of RAM memory. IPhone 12 Pro Max has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and the same video resolution, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and better 60 fps video frame rate.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has superior battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has 3687mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z3. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z3, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.