Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is much better than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, having a global score of 93.2 against 82.1. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's body is thinner than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, although it is somewhat heavier and was released around 13 months before. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A13 5G works with Android 12 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a quite larger display, a much higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher 1284 x 2778 resolution. The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a faster processor than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU.
The Galaxy A13 5G takes just a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A13 5G has improved battery duration than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3687mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.