Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is a lot better than the Galaxy A22, with a 93.2 score against 76.1. Although the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy A22 were only released with a couple of months difference, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max body is thinner but also somewhat heavier than Galaxy A22. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A22 comes with Android 12 operating system.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a much better number of pixels per inch in the screen, a way higher resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels and a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A22 has a superior storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
IPhone 12 Pro Max features a superior processing power than Galaxy A22, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64 bits processor. IPhone 12 Pro Max has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22. The iPhone 12 Pro Max shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.