Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-11-13 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A52's score of 90.7. Although the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy A52 were released with only a few months difference, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max design is somewhat thinner but heavier. IPhone 12 Pro Max has a better display than Galaxy A52, because it has a little bit bigger display, a little bit greater pixels density and a quite better 1284 x 2778 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 12 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max features a better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Samsung Galaxy A52 captures a lot better photographs and videos than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy A52 features better battery life than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3687mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.