Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's 91.3 general score. Even though Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G were only released 4 months apart, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max construction is somewhat heavier but also somewhat thinner. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with Android 12 OS.
IPhone 12 Pro Max features a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has 2 less cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a just a bit greater screen density, a bit higher resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels and a little larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro Max, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features greater battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 22 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.