Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52s's score of 91.1. IPhone 12 Pro Max's design is somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A52s, but it's heavier and was released around 10 months before. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A52s works with Android 11 operating system.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a faster processor than Galaxy A52s, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processor. The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a quite larger screen, a quite greater display pixels density and a slightly better 1284 x 2778px resolution.
The Galaxy A52s shoots a lot better videos and photos than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or video in low light situations and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy A52s features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A52s also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with better battery lifetime than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 22% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.