Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-11-13 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro Max is much better than the Galaxy A6, having a overall score of 93.2 against 75.8. The iPhone 12 Pro Max construction is much newer and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A6's, but it's also much heavier. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A6, because although it has 2 lesser cores , it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a larger display, a much greater screen pixels density and a lot better 1284 x 2778 resolution. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max features just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
IPhone 12 Pro Max features superior battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 3687mAh battery size. IPhone 12 Pro Max captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and a lot better video definition.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.