Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-11-13 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro Max is a little bit better than Galaxy A9 (2018), getting a general score of 93.2 against 85.2. Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is somewhat heavier than Galaxy A9 (2018), it's a little bit thinner and newer. The iPhone 12 Pro Max features a better screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a better 1284 x 2778 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a bit higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a much more MP camera.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 3800mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.