Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 457 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a global score of 93.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62's 88.1 general score. Even though the iPhone 12 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy F62 were released only 3 months apart, the iPhone 12 Pro Max body is just a little heavier but extremely thinner than Samsung Galaxy F62. IPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with Android 11 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a brighter display than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size display, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a little more pixels per inch of screen, a quite better 1284 x 2778 resolution and a really brighter display. Galaxy F62 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max features a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a 64 bits processor and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy F62 captures much better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 3687mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.