Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 457 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M51, having a 93.2 score against 87.7. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's body is a little heavier but extremely thinner than Samsung Galaxy M51, and they were released only a few months apart. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy M51 works with Android 10 operating system.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display of the same size, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a better resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a quite greater pixel number per display inch. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy M51, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 12 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 90% bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy M51 captures much better pictures and videos than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.