Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-13 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is much better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's construction is way thinner and lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though they were only released 7 months apart. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit lower 1284 x 2778 pixels resolution and a little bit worse amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a much bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 12 Pro Max captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also counts with a way better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 22% more battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.