Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is better than Galaxy XCover Pro, having a 93.2 score against 81. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy XCover Pro comes with Android 11 operating system. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's design is newer and way thinner, but just a little heavier than Galaxy XCover Pro.
IPhone 12 Pro Max features a better performing processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a just a bit greater pixel amount in each screen inch and a higher 1284 x 2778 resolution.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max features just a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a much worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low light situations and a much better (4K) video definition. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity against 3687mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy XCover Pro. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy XCover Pro, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.