Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's global score of 88.5. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with Android 12 OS. Although the iPhone 12 Pro Max is newer than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
IPhone 12 Pro Max has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor. IPhone 12 Pro Max has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a display of the same size, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a little bit better amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1284 x 2778px.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3687mAh battery size. Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better camera than iPhone 12 Pro Max, although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking pictures and video in low-light situations, they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.