Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-13 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is much better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro's general score of 80.2. Although the iPhone 12 Pro Max is incredibly heavier than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, it's just a little thinner and also newer. IPhone 12 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 OS.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a brighter screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels, a little bit bigger screen and a just a little better number of pixels per inch of display. IPhone 12 Pro Max features just a bit better processing power than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 less cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a better camera than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has an 8% more battery size.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max costs a lot more money than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.