Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is much better than the ZTE Axon 20's overall score of 77.8. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's body is heavier but a little bit thinner than the ZTE Axon 20, and both of them were released only 1 months apart. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, and ZTE Axon 20 works with Android 10 OS.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max features a greater hardware performance than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a much better looking display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels.
ZTE Axon 20 counts with a way better camera than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
ZTE Axon 20 and Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max both count with really similar memory capacity for applications and games, both have equal internal memory capacity. The ZTE Axon 20 counts with a bit better battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity.
IPhone 12 Pro Max is a lot more expensive than the ZTE Axon 20, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.