Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro is better than the Google Pixel, having a general score of 92.8 against 80.2. The iPhone 12 Pro construction is a lot newer and thinner, but way heavier than the Google Pixel. IPhone 12 Pro has a quite better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a 64 bits processor, a higher number of cores (and faster) and more RAM memory.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a sharper screen than Google Pixel, because it has a just a little higher screen density, a higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a larger screen. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with lesser megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
The Google Pixel and iPhone 12 Pro count with extremely similar storage capacity for applications and games, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 2815mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.