Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is much better than Google Pixel 3's overall score of 80. The iPhone 12 Pro body is way newer and just a little bit thinner than Google Pixel 3's, although it's much heavier. The iPhone 12 Pro features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a quite larger display, a slightly higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little bit higher pixels count per inch of screen.
IPhone 12 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a better CPU than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a 64-bit processor.
Google Pixel 3 features a little longer battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity. Apple iPhone 12 Pro shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.