Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, having a 92.8 score against 80.7. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro body is way newer and a little thinner, but a bit heavier than the Google Pixel 3 XL. The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a bit inferior pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a bit worse resolution of 1170 x 2532px.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a better processing power than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 12 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal memory.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro captures a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower video resolution and a lower 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with better battery life than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 22% more battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.