Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | HTC |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 457 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro is way better than the HTC U Ultra, having a 92.8 score against 77. IPhone 12 Pro's body is notably newer and just a bit thinner than HTC U Ultra's, but it is also a bit heavier. IPhone 12 Pro has a much better screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little lower 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The iPhone 12 Pro has a superior processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 64-bits processing unit, a larger amount of RAM and more cores. The iPhone 12 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution, the iPhone 12 Pro also has a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and video and better video frame rates.
HTC U Ultra has a much greater memory to install applications and games than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. HTC U Ultra has a bit longer battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh.
The iPhone 12 Pro costs more than the HTC U Ultra, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.