Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro is better than LG V40 ThinQ, having a overall score of 92.8 against 81.2. The iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while LG V40 ThinQ counts with Android 10 OS. The iPhone 12 Pro design is notably newer and a little bit thinner than the LG V40 ThinQ's, although it's somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a quite lower 1170 x 2532 resolution, a quite smaller screen and a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen.
The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a quite better hardware performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 12 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than iPhone 12 Pro, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, a same resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a bigger camera aperture.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a superior storage for games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ has better battery life than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone 12 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG V40 ThinQ, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.