Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is way better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. The iPhone 12 Pro is a way newer phone than the Moto Z Force, although it's just a bit thicker and heavier. The iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat OS. Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a greater hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory, a larger number of cores and a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse screen density and a bit lower 1170 x 2532 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Moto Z Force has a camera that is very similar to the camera in iPhone 12 Pro, because although the Moto Z Force has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Moto Z Force features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force has improved battery life than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 24% more battery size.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 12 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z Force, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.