Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 global score. Even though the iPhone 12 Pro is much newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel quantity in each screen inch and a little bit lower 1170 x 2532px resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a better performing processing unit than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and more RAM.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro shoots slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a 12 megapixels back-facing camera, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The iPhone 12 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 2815mAh battery size.
The iPhone 12 Pro is more expensive than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.