Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 general score. Apple iPhone 12 Pro's construction is noticeably newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, but it is a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a little bit better pixels number in each screen inch.
IPhone 12 Pro has a better CPU than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has lesser CPU cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and more RAM. The iPhone 12 Pro shoots clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels camera and the same (4K) video quality, the iPhone 12 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations.
The Moto Z2 Play features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Play has just a little bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.