Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-10-23 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3, getting a global score of 92.8 against 77.6. IPhone 12 Pro's body is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z3's, but it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. IPhone 12 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie OS.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a more vivid screen than Moto Z3, because it has a bit larger display, a slightly better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Motorola Moto Z3 features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
IPhone 12 Pro has a greater hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a 64-bits CPU. The Moto Z3 has a bit better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2815mAh.
IPhone 12 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the iPhone 12 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger aperture.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z3. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 12 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z3, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.