Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is much better than Moto Z3 Play, getting a 92.8 score against 76.3. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro body is noticeably newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Moto Z3 Play. IPhone 12 Pro features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a just a little higher display density.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a quite superior performance than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has less cpu cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z3 Play features just a bit better battery life than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2815mAh. IPhone 12 Pro takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a 12 mega-pixels camera, the iPhone 12 Pro also has a bigger aperture and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The iPhone 12 Pro is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.