Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-10-23 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is much better than Galaxy A13 5G, getting a 92.8 score against 82.1. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro body is thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy A13 5G, although it was released just a little further than a year before. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A13 5G comes with Android 12 OS.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor and 2 GB more RAM. Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a way better amount of pixels per display inch.
IPhone 12 Pro has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G captures clearer photos and videos than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A13 5G has a much better battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.