Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro has a score of 92.8, which is much better than Galaxy A6's 75.8 global score. The iPhone 12 Pro design is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A6. Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor and a greater amount of RAM memory.
IPhone 12 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a much better 1170 x 2532 resolution, a lot higher number of pixels per display inch and a little bit bigger screen. Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A6 has just a little better battery duration than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a way higher (4K) video quality.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A6, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.