Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy S10e, with a 92.8 score against 86.3. Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Galaxy S10e, but it's much heavier. Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a superior processor than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a sharper display than Galaxy S10e, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px. Galaxy S10e counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little better battery duration than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity instead of 2815mAh. Samsung Galaxy S10e captures just a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone 12 Pro, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and a same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger aperture.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S10e. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S10e, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.