Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-10-23 | 2014-06-23 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Blue and Red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is much better than Galaxy S5 Sport, having a general score of 92.8 against 77.8. Although the iPhone 12 Pro is heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport, it's thinner and much newer. The iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy S5 Sport comes with Android 4.4.2 operating system.
The iPhone 12 Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a little better display pixels density, a higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a bigger screen. Apple iPhone 12 Pro features much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a better performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores , a 64 bits processing unit and more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a battery duration that is just as good as Apple iPhone 12 Pro's battery lifetime, although the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has just 2800mAh battery size.
IPhone 12 Pro has a bit better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S5 Sport. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone 12 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy S5 Sport, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.