Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is way better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting a 92.8 score against 75.8. IPhone 12 Pro's body is way newer and notably thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, but it's also a little bit heavier. The iPhone 12 Pro has a superior processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM, a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch and a bit lower 1170 x 2532 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen and a really brighter screen. The iPhone 12 Pro has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same video quality, the iPhone 12 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a much better battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2815mAh.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.