Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-23 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. Apple iPhone 12 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo OS. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a way thinner and incredibly lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though they were released only a few months apart.
IPhone 12 Pro has a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a larger amount of RAM memory. Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels, it also counts with a larger display.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro also counts with a much better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a really longer battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2815mAh.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.