Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-23 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 score. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the iPhone 12 Pro body is just a little thicker and just a little heavier than Galaxy Z Flip. IPhone 12 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy Z Flip counts with Android 12 operating system.
IPhone 12 Pro features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a little higher display pixel density. The iPhone 12 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores (although faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, although it has a smaller camera aperture, they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the same (4K) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates. Galaxy Z Flip features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip features greater battery life than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 17 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.