Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-23 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 3, with a 92.8 score against 90.6. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy Z Fold 3 works with Android 11 OS. Apple iPhone 12 Pro is an older and somewhat thicker phone than the Galaxy Z Fold 3, but Apple could make it noticeably lighter anyway.
The iPhone 12 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone 12 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1170 x 2532 resolution, it also counts with a little higher screen pixel density.
IPhone 12 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the iPhone 12 Pro also has a much bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a really longer battery life than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.