Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | HTC |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 829.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 457 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 is much better than the HTC U Ultra, having a global score of 88.7 against 77. IPhone 12's body is extremely newer, just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than the HTC U Ultra. IPhone 12 has a brighter screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit worse display pixel density and a little worse 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display.
IPhone 12 features a superior processor than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone 12 also has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and a 64-bit CPU. The HTC U Ultra has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 12, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
HTC U Ultra features just a bit better battery performance than iPhone 12, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. IPhone 12 captures clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the iPhone 12 also has a larger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Apple iPhone 12 costs a little more money than HTC U Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.