Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-23 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 829.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 is much better than the Moto G Power, with a general score of 88.7 against 76.1. IPhone 12 counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Moto G Power counts with Android 11 OS. IPhone 12's design is somewhat lighter and extremely thinner than the Moto G Power, even though they were released only a couple of months apart.
The iPhone 12 features a better performing CPU than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone 12 also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Apple iPhone 12 features a sharper display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1170 x 2532.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 12, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Power also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G Power and iPhone 12 both have really similar cameras, because although the Moto G Power has worse video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a much better resolution camera.
Moto G Power features a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 12, because it has a 78 percent larger battery size.
Although iPhone 12 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Moto G Power, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.