Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 829.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 has a global score of 88.7, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. IPhone 12's design is incredibly newer than Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it is just a bit heavier and just a little thicker. The iPhone 12 counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat OS.
Apple iPhone 12 has a greater hardware performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 12 also has a 64-bit CPU and 2 more cpu cores. The iPhone 12 features a little more vivid display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite worse pixels density and a little bit lower 1170 x 2532 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
Moto Z Force's camera is very similar to iPhone 12's camera, because although the Moto Z Force has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, it also counts with a much more MP camera.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a much better storage to store more apps and games than iPhone 12, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force counts with better battery duration than iPhone 12, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 2815mAh.
Although iPhone 12 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 12, else you can save some money and get the Moto Z Force, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.