Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 829.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 is better than Galaxy A6, getting an 88.7 score against 75.8. Although iPhone 12 is a little bit heavier than the Galaxy A6, it's just a little bit thinner and also much newer. IPhone 12 counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, because although it has 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone 12 counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a much greater screen density, a quite larger screen and a much better 1170 x 2532px resolution. Samsung Galaxy A6 has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 12, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 400 GB.
Apple iPhone 12 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video. Samsung Galaxy A6 has just a bit better battery life than iPhone 12, because it has a 7% greater battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.