Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-10-23 | 2014-06-23 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 829.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 has a score of 88.7, which is better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's score of 77.8. The Apple iPhone 12 is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Galaxy S5 Sport, but it is just a little heavier. Apple iPhone 12 has iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy S5 Sport comes with Android 4.4.2 operating system.
The iPhone 12 has a better performing processor than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores , a 64-bits processing unit and a higher amount of RAM memory. The iPhone 12 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a better 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution, a little more pixels per inch of screen and a larger screen.
Apple iPhone 12 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 48 GB more internal memory. The Apple iPhone 12 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a camera with way less MP and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a battery life that is very similar to the battery life in iPhone 12, although the Galaxy S5 Sport has just 2800mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S5 Sport. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy S5 Sport, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.