Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 829.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a score of 88.7 against 75.8. IPhone 12 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. IPhone 12 has just a bit better screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little worse count of pixels per inch in the display and a bit lower 1170 x 2532 resolution, it also counts with way more brightness and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a better storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 12, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 200 GB. The Apple iPhone 12 has a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 12 also has a larger number of cores and a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 12 takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same resolution camera, the Apple iPhone 12 also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy S7 Active has a much better battery duration than iPhone 12, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2815mAh.
Although iPhone 12 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.