Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-23 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 829.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 88.7 score against 80.1. Even when the iPhone 12 and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released 7 months apart, the iPhone 12 is much thinner and way lighter. The iPhone 12 works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
Apple iPhone 12 features a greater hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 12 also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone 12 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little lower 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a little bit lower pixel count per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone 12, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone 12, because it has a 60% greater battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 12 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Apple iPhone 12 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Apple iPhone 12 is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.