Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-23 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 829.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, getting a overall score of 88.7 against 88.5. The Apple iPhone 12 counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip works with Android 12 OS. Even though the Apple iPhone 12 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip were released only a few months apart, the Apple iPhone 12 body is lighter but also just a bit thicker.
IPhone 12 has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. IPhone 12 has a much better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a just a bit greater pixels density.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone 12, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images in poorly lited situations, they both have the same resolution back camera, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality. Galaxy Z Flip features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 12, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, iPhone 12 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.