Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Apple |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 10.71 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is slightly better than the Apple iPhone X, getting a overall score of 93.2 against 88.1. IPhone 13 Pro Max's body has the same thickness than the Apple iPhone X, but it's notably heavier. IPhone X has a bit better looking display than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1125 x 2436, it also counts with a quite higher display density.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit better processing power than iPhone X, and although they both have a Hexa-Core processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has more RAM memory. IPhone X takes just a bit better photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same resolution back facing camera and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Apple iPhone X has a much bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has more internal memory capacity. IPhone 13 Pro Max features a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the iPhone 13 Pro Max is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.