Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.71 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is better than the Google Pixel, getting a global score of 93.2 against 80.2. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max design is extremely newer and thinner, but way heavier than Google Pixel. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel, because it has a much bigger screen, a better resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a quite better pixel amount in each inch in the display.
Google Pixel counts with as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a really superior hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM, a greater number of cores and a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 57% larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.