Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is better than the Google Pixel 2 XL, getting a score of 93.2 against 82.5. IPhone 13 Pro Max's design is a lot newer and just a bit thinner, but extremely heavier than Google Pixel 2 XL. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a superior processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has lesser cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a bit worse 1284 x 2778 pixels resolution and a little inferior count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with as much memory for applications and games as the iPhone 13 Pro Max one, both of them have the same internal storage.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lower video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has greater battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 24% greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 2 XL, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.