Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a global score of 93.2, which is much better than Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 overall score. The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a way newer and just a little bit thinner phone than the Google Pixel 3 XL, although it's way heavier. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a larger amount of RAM.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels and a bit inferior pixel number per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features superior battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 27% larger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3 XL, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.