Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is better than Google Pixel 3a, with a general score of 93.2 against 78.8. IPhone 13 Pro Max's design is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner than Google Pixel 3a's, although it is notably heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a better performing processor than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has lesser processing cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a larger display and a better resolution of 1284 x 2778.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower video definition and a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photos. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3a, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.