Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a global score of 93.2, which is much better than Google Pixel 4's 81.9 global score. Although the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a lot heavier than Google Pixel 4, it's just a bit thinner and also newer. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit better screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a quite better screen pixel density, a larger screen and a better resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a superior performance than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone 13 Pro Max captures clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 4, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.